California’s plan to phase out new gas-powered car sales is facing fresh political uncertainty as leading governor candidate Xavier Becerra signals he may not fully support the target. The policy, which aims to end sales of new gas and hybrid vehicles by 2035, has long been a key part of the state’s climate agenda.
The debate centers on the future of the California EV phaseout strategy, one of the most ambitious clean transport plans in the United States. Becerra, a former U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary and former state attorney general, is currently leading early polls ahead of the June 2 primary for governor.
In recent responses to a political survey, Becerra declined to fully commit to maintaining the 2035 goal. He said the transition from gas vehicles should only happen when conditions such as infrastructure, affordability, and public readiness are in place for families across the state.
His comments were later reinforced in interviews, where he stressed that the shift away from fossil fuels depends heavily on support from the federal government, car manufacturers, and California’s own budget planning. He warned against what he described as unrealistic promises about how quickly the transition can happen.
“We’re not going to live in a world that’s make-believe,” he said, adding that clear timelines depend on real-world conditions rather than political targets.
The 2035 target was originally set under Governor Gavin Newsom, who has made electric vehicle expansion a central part of his climate policy. The plan is designed to cut emissions and speed up adoption of electric vehicles across the state.
The issue has become politically sensitive as California balances climate goals with rising concerns about affordability. Electric vehicles still cost more upfront than many gas-powered cars, even though supporters argue long-term savings come from lower fuel and maintenance costs.
Becerra has increasingly aligned himself with a more moderate economic approach during his campaign. He has emphasized affordability concerns and has argued that gasoline will remain necessary for the foreseeable future. In a recent public forum, he even suggested that major oil companies like Chevron will still play a role in everyday life.
His position has drawn criticism from climate-focused Democrats and clean energy supporters. Some see it as a step back from California’s leadership role in environmental policy, while others argue it reflects practical concerns about implementation.
The broader California EV phaseout debate also reflects national political shifts. The return of President Donald Trump to office has changed federal climate support policies, including the removal of EV tax credits and emissions-related incentives. These changes have impacted electric vehicle sales, which slowed in late 2025.
In response, the Newsom administration has introduced new rebate programs to encourage EV purchases. A $200 million state-level incentive plan is now being considered to support adoption and offset federal cuts.
Despite these challenges, Newsom has continued to defend the 2035 target, saying California must stay committed to reducing emissions and improving air quality. His administration has also adjusted some climate programs to reduce costs for industries while maintaining long-term environmental goals.
The California Air Resources Board has recently adjusted parts of its emissions trading system to ease financial pressure on oil refineries. However, officials say the state’s overall commitment to clean transportation remains unchanged.
Within the Democratic race, Becerra’s position contrasts with rival Tom Steyer, a billionaire climate activist who strongly supports the 2035 phaseout. Steyer has criticized Becerra’s approach and accused him of being too close to oil industry interests.
Other candidates have taken mixed positions. San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan supports the 2035 goal but has suggested it should be reviewed for feasibility. Former Representative Katie Porter has not publicly detailed her position on the policy.
Experts and analysts are divided over the debate. Some transportation researchers warn that weakening EV targets could slow innovation and reduce California’s influence in global clean energy markets. Others argue that policy flexibility is necessary to ensure affordability and infrastructure readiness.
The outcome of the governor’s race could have major implications for California’s climate direction. As the state continues to lead U.S. environmental policy, the future of the California EV phaseout plan now depends on how the next governor balances economic pressure with long-term climate goals.
