The UN climate summit failed to produce a clear plan to phase out fossil fuels, leaving the EU increasingly isolated as global climate ambition fades. COP30 in Belém ended with a final text that contained no roadmap, prompting critics to call it a moral failure and an empty deal. The United States’ withdrawal from climate negotiations created both a political and financial void, with President Donald Trump dismissing climate change as a “con job.” Countries heavily reliant on fossil-fuel revenue, including Saudi Arabia and the UAE, opposed any targets or timelines for phasing out fossil fuels.
One day before COP30 concluded, the EU threatened to reject the agreement, which required consensus from nearly 200 nations. Ultimately, EU leaders endorsed the text, acknowledging its weak ambition but seeing no alternative. Despite the outcome, the 27-member bloc reaffirmed its commitment to the 1.5°C limit and to reducing pollution and global warming. The EU pledged to continue the transition away from fossil fuels at home and to fund clean-energy projects abroad. European Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra emphasized that the EU acted united and pushed for stronger global climate ambition.
Fragmented Alliances Challenge Progress
Dutch MEP Mohammed Chahim said President Lula set high expectations, and the EU arrived ready to lead a coalition of ambitious nations. However, fragmentation in the international system hampered success. Resistance from oil-producing states proved too strong, and shifting geopolitical balances reduced momentum for fossil-fuel reduction. Chahim noted that the EU and the United Kingdom had to struggle against the tide while BRICS nations resisted decisive action.
BRICS, a coalition of ten emerging economies led by Moscow, positioned itself as a counterweight to Western influence. Irish Minister Darragh O’Brien said he reluctantly supported the final text, regretting the absence of a credible fossil-fuel phase-out roadmap. Over 80 countries, including Ireland, had demanded such a roadmap during COP30, but negotiators refused to include it. Former US Vice President Al Gore criticized petrostates for blocking progress but highlighted Brazil’s ongoing effort to develop a global roadmap supported by nations calling for stronger climate action.
Science and Law Sound the Alarm
Climate experts and environmental advocates strongly criticized the summit’s outcome. Nikki Reisch of the Centre for International Environmental Law called the deal “empty,” arguing that it ignored repeated scientific and legal calls to replace fossil fuels and hold polluters accountable. She warned that major emitters stalled progress and withheld funding while the planet faced escalating crises.
Doug Weir from the Conflict and Environment Observatory described the final text as a moral failure, leaving communities already suffering severe climate impacts behind. He added that negotiators had made no progress since Dubai and now faced an even steeper challenge. A Climate Analytics report estimated that full implementation of COP28 pledges could reduce global warming by a third within ten years, and halve warming rates by 2040 if governments tripled renewable energy, doubled efficiency, and acted on methane. Climate Analytics CEO Bill Hare said such measures could limit warming below 2°C, instead of the projected 2.6°C.
World leaders gathered in Belém to review progress toward the 1.5°C goal, ten years after the Paris Agreement. After two weeks of discussions, the summit concluded, and Australia and Turkey will host the next COP meetings to rebuild momentum for international climate action.
